Capture four relationships

For important work, identify:

  • the selected source material;
  • the activity that produced the artifact;
  • any finding that caused a revision;
  • the accountable decision that chose the current version.

These relationships differ from a general source library. A library says what material exists. Provenance says what this artifact used and how it became this version.

Prefer explicit relationships over narrative memory

W3C PROV-O defines a vocabulary for entities, activities, agents, generation, and derivation. CommonMark provides a portable way to express a small relationship table in plain text. The NIST AI Risk Management Framework places documentation within broader governance and risk-management work.

You do not need a complex graph for every note. A short table with artifact, used, changed because, and chosen by can carry the essential explanation.

Match detail to consequence

This provenance method fits artifacts that support recurring, shared, public, or consequential work. It is excessive for a temporary brainstorm with no downstream use.

Do not record secrets merely to make the history exhaustive. The record should explain the work while respecting the boundary around private material.

Trace one claim through correction

The synthetic provenance note connects the unsupported Saturday sentence to the source finding and corrected brief.

Place provenance beside adjacent memory choices

Keep AI Work in Files You Control establishes the parent record. Keep Rejected AI Work as Correction History decides whether an earlier artifact belongs in that history. Redact an AI Workspace Safely protects private material while preserving necessary relationships.